Rideshare pickup zone

What the California Supreme Court’s Decision in the Uber Lawsuit Means for Gig Workers

For years, there has been an ongoing struggle between maintaining the convenience and flexibility of the gig economy and protecting the rights of workers who try to make a living within its framework. Now, a recent court decision in a lawsuit against Uber Technologies Inc. could pave the way for better gig worker rights in California and across the country. It could also lead to large-scale legal action against employers in the state.

The California State Supreme Court ruled that a 2019 lawsuit against Uber can proceed. The claim was filed by an UberEats driver seeking reimbursement for work-related expenses.

The case centered on the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA), a unique law that exists only in California. The law allows workers to sue for employment law violations on behalf of themselves, other workers, and the state and keep a portion of the money they recover.

Plaintiff Erik Adolph brought a class action lawsuit accusing Uber of misclassifying UberEats drivers as independent contractors instead of employees. He claimed that delivery drivers should be reimbursed for business expenses under state law.

Adolph sought civil penalties for the ridesharing company’s labor violations for himself and other former and current “aggrieved employees.” Uber tried to force him into private arbitration and dismiss his class action claims. The company argued that the parties had signed an agreement that required Adolph to enter individual arbitration of his claims against Uber.

In a unanimous ruling, the California State Supreme Court sided with Adolph in saying that he did not waive his right to sue Uber on behalf of a large group of UberEats workers despite signing an agreement to resolve his work-related legal claims in private arbitration. The court said that the law does not bar workers from arbitrating their individual claims while litigating a separate large-scale PAGA claim in court on behalf of other workers.

The California Supreme Court decision challenges a 2022 ruling in a lawsuit that involved Viking River Cruises. In that case, the U.S. Supreme Court held that companies could force individual claims into arbitration, meaning that workers gave up their right to pursue a PAGA claim on a class or representative basis in court if they had signed an arbitration agreement. The decision was seen as a victory for employers seeking to limit large-scale actions related to PAGA claims.

However, the California Supreme Court’s ruling in Adolph v. Uber Technologies, Inc. marks a major shift back in favor of workers. The decision could prompt employers to think twice before forcing workers into mandatory arbitration if PAGA class action lawsuits can still be brought in court. An attorney for Uber said the company was looking into “appellate options.”

Many nonunion workers in the private sector are required to sign arbitration agreements as a condition of employment. Such agreements typically bar them from bringing or participating in class action lawsuits in court. Mandatory arbitration also deters workers from pursuing individual claims that involve small amounts of money. Additionally, workers who arbitrate their disputes are less likely to win.

Companies like Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, and Postmates often label workers as independent contractors to cut costs and maximize profits. Doing so enables companies to avoid paying minimum wage, reimbursing business expenses, and providing benefits.

In 2020, California passed Proposition 22, allowing gig companies to classify their workers as independent contractors instead of employees. However, the measure has been controversial and far from a definitive resolution to the ongoing debate about worker classification. The California Supreme Court’s ruling could lead to better working conditions, fairer pay, and various benefits for gig workers.

At McCormack Law Firm, we believe that workers should be empowered to fight for their rights. If you have been misclassified as an independent contractor when you are an employee, reach out to us right away. While we are not involved with this Uber lawsuit, our San Francisco employment lawyers are dedicated to protecting the rights of workers and ensuring they are not taken advantage of by employers.

McCormack Law Firm can help you hold your employer accountable for their unlawful labor practices. We keep up to date with the latest developments in California labor law to ensure our clients receive the best legal representation. Contact us today to learn more and discuss your situation.

Read more

Workers sorting produce in warehouse

Misclassified Delivery Drivers Get $650,000 in Back Wages from Romero’s Food Products

A food manufacturer in Santa Fe Springs, California, is on the hook for $650,000 after the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) efforts to recover back wages for a group of misclassified delivery…

Retail working in a mask standing behind an open sign

Marin County Home Consignment Center Worker Wins $1.3 Million in COVID-19 Whistleblower Lawsuit

People often think of whistleblowing in relation to exposing a major scandal or government wrongdoing. However, being a whistleblower does not always have to be so dramatic in the context of workplace…

Restaurant workers discussing their employer

Sacramento Restaurant Uses Fake Priest to Get Workers to Confess Wrongdoing

Even though workplace retaliation is unlawful, employers sometimes try to take advantage of workers who do not know or understand their rights. Examples of retaliation include threatening to report employees to immigration…

Asian tech worker working late at night

Silicon Valley Firm Faces $20 Million Lawsuit Over Anti-Asian Discrimination

An Asian former employee of a Silicon Valley tech firm is seeking $20 million in damages after being fired due to the company’s alleged “culture of prejudice against Asians.” He filed a…