What the Grubhub trial could mean for workers in the gig economy
In the first lawsuit of its kind to make it to trial in California, Grubhub fought allegations of misclassifying its drivers as independent contractors instead of employees. Other worker misclassification lawsuits in the past have been resolved via settlements.
The Lawson v. Grubhub case was filed in an San Francisco federal court in December 2015. Plaintiff Raef Lawson formerly worked as a driver for the food delivery startup for five months starting in October 2015. He claimed he was underpaid because he was classified as an independent contractor instead of an employee. Lawson also said Grubhub owed him overtime pay and reimbursements for business expenses.
The Grubhub trial’s outcome could have a big impact on the employment status of workers in the fast-growing gig economy. It could set a precedent for other similar lawsuits. The case has received substantial attention due to its implications for on-demand companies such Uber, Lyft, Postmates and Doordash that rely on independent contractors.
One of the key factors considered in the case was the amount of control Grubhub had over Lawson and other drivers. Lawson’s attorney noted that the company tracked his location, told him to wear a Grubhub hat and shirt, and required him to accept almost all deliveries in under 20 seconds.
However, Grubhub maintained that the company did not have control over Lawson. He was free to set his own hours, wear anything he wanted and take the routes of his choice for deliveries, among other factors.
In addition, Grubhub argued food delivery is not a core part of its business. The company said it simply connects customers with restaurants. This aspect is likely to be significant in determining whether the drivers are considered independent contractors or employees.
Wage Theft Is A Big Problem in the Fast-Food Industry, A Survey Finds
Wage theft can occur in any workplace, but it tends to happen more frequently in specific industries compared to others. A survey published in May 2022 revealed that wage theft is a…
Matco Tools To Pay 15.8 Million Dollars in a Misclassification Lawsuit
Disclaimer: This article is for information purposes only. McCormack Law Firm is not involved in this class action. Worker misclassification remains a serious issue in California. When employers misclassify employees as independent…
Google Contractors Blame Recruiting Firm For Systemic Wage Theft
Silicon Valley tech companies have been in the news lately over accusations of gender discrimination, harassment, and toxic work environments. This time, Google is facing allegations that its contractors are subjected to…
Red Robin Assistant Manager Files Class Action Over Unpaid Overtime and Missed Breaks
California employees can be classified as exempt or non-exempt, and there are important differences between the two. Non-exempt workers receive overtime pay, meal breaks and paid rest breaks. Exempt workers, on the…