DoorDash to pay delivery workers $5 million in misclassification lawsuit

DoorDash to pay delivery workers $5 million in misclassification lawsuit

As on-demand food delivery services such as GrubHub and UberEats grow in popularity, their business practices are coming under increasing scrutiny, often accompanied by legal trouble. One such company is DoorDash, which was hit with a class action lawsuit over worker misclassification.

The startup was accused of misclassifying its food delivery workers as independent contractors instead of employees in violation of the labor code. Lead plaintiffs Evan Kissner and Cynthia Marciano filed two separate worker misclassification lawsuits against DoorDash in September 2015.

The company agreed to a $5 million settlement, pending court approval. The lawsuit’s 33,744 class members will split $3.5 million, with Kissner and Marciano receiving $7,500 each. In addition, DoorDash will pay an extra $1.5 million in four years if it is acquired by another company, is profitable for a year or goes public.

The lawsuit covers individuals who worked as independent contractors to carry out one or more deliveries for DoorDash from September 23, 2011 to August 29, 2016. According to settlement terms, the workers who carried out more DoorDash deliveries will be paid a higher amount.

Although DoorDash agreed to the settlement, the company will not change worker status. Instead, it is making certain polices clearer and providing workers with more rights. Additionally, the settlement does not protect DoorDash from future potential worker misclassification lawsuits.

Addressing the lawsuit, DoorDash General Counsel Keith Yandell posted on the company blog, “We firmly believe that the autonomy and flexibility Dashers love is made possible by, and consistent only with, their status as independent contractors . . . We feel that this settlement represents a fair compromise.”

[footer block_id=’778′]

Read more

In a recent case, three former Zurich American Insurance Company employees in Northern California were awarded more than $80 million in damages after being wrongfully terminated for taking “off-the-record” paid time off.

Insurance Company Workers Fired for Off-the-Record Time Off Get $80 Million

In a recent case, three former Zurich American Insurance Company employees in Northern California were awarded more than $80 million in damages after being wrongfully terminated for taking “off-the-record” paid time off….

READ ARTICLE
T.J. Maxx is no stranger to legal battles involving California labor laws.

T.J. Maxx Workers in California Sue for Missed Breaks and Unpaid Sick Leave

California workers benefit from some of the strongest labor laws in the country, which are designed to ensure fair treatment on the job. However, some employers still commit employment violations despite these…

READ ARTICLE
Borlase filed a wrongful termination and retaliation lawsuit against SF State and the California State University (CSU) system in San Francisco Superior Court. She accused them of failing to properly investigate hundreds of misconduct claims.

SF State Employee Faces Retaliation for Speaking Up About Ignored Misconduct Complaints

Imagine this: you are hired to address a backlog of discrimination and harassment complaints at a university. You take your job seriously, launch investigations and strive to create a safe space for…

READ ARTICLE
A San Francisco tech startup is facing several lawsuits filed by former employees, both women.

San Francisco Tech Startup Under Fire for Sexual Harassment and Gender Discrimination

The company culture at tech startups can commonly be characterized by a combination of informality, flexibility and innovation, along with a strong emphasis on collaboration. Startups tend to have less formal hierarchies…

READ ARTICLE
SEEN ON
Fox40-bw
KPIX-bw
SFGate-bw
marin-ij
Abc10-bw