Transit board to pay $8 million to Muni operators in overtime lawsuit

Transit board to pay $8 million to Muni operators in overtime lawsuit

The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) approved an $8 million settlement in an overtime lawsuit brought by the city’s Muni operators.

Lead plaintiff Darryl A. Stitt, a former Muni operator, filed the lawsuit in U.S. District Court in 2012. It received class action certification in 2014. The complaint alleged the SFMTA violated California labor laws by not paying due overtime to Muni operators.

Muni operators were allegedly not properly paid for certain post-shift inspections and travel time between bus yards. The lawsuit said, “Operators who commute from home to work to their start-shift point must travel back to their vehicle at the end of their run, before they can commence their commute from work to home.”

Employees claimed that the time spent traveling between their vehicle and the start or end point of their run is compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act. They argued the transportation agency made route and scheduling decisions for its benefit. The lawsuit also alleged that the SFMTA failed to maintain correct records of the Muni operators’ travel time.

The settlement is now awaiting judicial approval. SFMTA cable car, train and bus operators will get about $1,000 each under the deal. However, the transit agency denied any wrongdoing or liability in the case.


Some Muni operators claimed the $8 million settlement was not enough and said they plan to dispute it. The lawsuit was initially seeking $395 million in unpaid overtime.

Three plaintiffs wrote a joint letter to the judge saying, “The SFMTA over the years has been taking advantage of its employees and the San Francisco taxpayers by violating wage and hour standards.” They argued that enforcing the original $395 million judgment would help prevent future violations.

[footer block_id=’778′]

Read more

Fighting wage theft on your own can be stressful and difficult, which is why it is a good idea to consult an experienced employment lawyer

Bay Area Subway Franchisee Faces Closure and $1 Million Penalty for Wage Theft

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ordered a 14-unit Subway franchisee in the San Francisco Bay Area to either close or sell their stores. The employers must pay…

READ ARTICLE
Firefighting apparel

Bay Area Fire District Pays $100,000 Settlement for Withdrawing Job Offer Based on Applicant’s Criminal Record

The Moraga-Orinda Fire Protection District (MOFD) agreed to pay nearly $97,500 to settle a case brought against it by a job applicant. The settlement, announced by the California Civil Rights Department, stems…

READ ARTICLE
Delivery worker scanning package in warehouse

Deaf FedEx Package Handler Gets $2 Million in Disability Discrimination Case

A former package handler at FedEx Ground who is deaf won a $2 million jury award in a disability discrimination lawsuit. The case highlights the need for employers to proactively address workers’…

READ ARTICLE
Rideshare pickup zone

What the California Supreme Court’s Decision in the Uber Lawsuit Means for Gig Workers

For years, there has been an ongoing struggle between maintaining the convenience and flexibility of the gig economy and protecting the rights of workers who try to make a living within its…

READ ARTICLE
SEEN ON
Fox40-bw
KPIX-bw
SFGate-bw
marin-ij
Abc10-bw