International Business Machines (IBM) has agreed to pay a $4.75 million proposed settlement to more than a thousand sales representatives who accused the company of shortchanging them hundreds of thousands of dollars in earned commissions.

IBM Workers To Get $4.75 Million Settlement After Suing For Unpaid Commissions

Disclaimer: This article is for information purposes only. McCormack Law Firm is not involved in this class action.

California has specific laws regarding commissions, and employers are required to pay workers according to those rules. When employees are paid through commissions, employers must have a written contract that specifies how the commissions will be determined and the conditions for earning them.

International Business Machines (IBM) has agreed to pay a $4.75 million proposed settlement to more than a thousand sales representatives who accused the company of shortchanging them hundreds of thousands of dollars in earned commissions. The company failed to provide them with written commission plans as required under state law.

The class action lawsuit alleged that IBM used “bait and switch” tactics to underpay around 1,500 sales representatives in California. The employer was accused of urging workers to exceed their quotas during each sales period but later reducing their payouts on lucrative deals. IBM also improperly capped the commissions of a subset of those employees after promising there would not be any caps.

Comin and Briggs v. IBM was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Lead plaintiff Mark Comin claimed IBM failed to pay him the full commissions he earned for closing large deals on three separate occasions. Mark Briggs, a former IBM sales manager, filed a lawsuit alleging that the company has a track record of failing to keep its payment commitments. The two complaints were later merged given their similarities.

The $4.75 million settlement applies to employees who lived in California while working for IBM on a commissions incentive plan between November 4, 2015, and the settlement’s preliminary approval date. It also covers a subclass of around 60 sales representatives for the same period who had their commissions improperly capped. Each class member was expected to receive $300, with additional compensation for the subset.

The lawsuit claimed that IBM provided sales representatives with only a so-called incentive plan letter instead of a written contract. The letter stated that the plan is not a contract or promise by the company to pay any commissions.

When workers are paid at least in part by commissions, California law requires employers to provide an enforceable written contract outlining how the commissions will be calculated and paid. The employee must sign the contract, and the employer should obtain a signed receipt from the employee. Employees who complete a sale and fulfill all the requirements of their employer’s commission plan are owed the payment of that commission in full.

Employers are prohibited from changing the commission plan later after the employee completes a sale. Workers who resign or are fired before the payout date may still be owed some commissions for any sales they made, in some instances.

If you believe your employer has failed to pay you the commissions you are owed, you have important rights. Reach out to a qualified employment lawyer who can help you understand your legal options for recovering the commissions you have earned.

While McCormack Law Firm was not involved with this IBM lawsuit, we have experience representing employees in several class actions as well as numerous individual wage and hour cases. Our San Francisco employment attorneys are not afraid to stand up to even the largest corporations. Contact us today for a free initial consultation.

Read more

Rideshare pickup zone

What the California Supreme Court’s Decision in the Uber Lawsuit Means for Gig Workers

For years, there has been an ongoing struggle between maintaining the convenience and flexibility of the gig economy and protecting the rights of workers who try to make a living within its…

READ ARTICLE
racial discrimination lawyer

Workday AI Hiring Tool Discriminates Based on Age and Race, Says Lawsuit

The topic of Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly dominating headlines and raising various ethical questions. While some view AI as a tool that benefits humans and makes life easier, others claim that…

READ ARTICLE
Workers sorting produce in warehouse

Misclassified Delivery Drivers Get $650,000 in Back Wages from Romero’s Food Products

A food manufacturer in Santa Fe Springs, California, is on the hook for $650,000 after the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) efforts to recover back wages for a group of misclassified delivery…

READ ARTICLE
Retail working in a mask standing behind an open sign

Marin County Home Consignment Center Worker Wins $1.3 Million in COVID-19 Whistleblower Lawsuit

People often think of whistleblowing in relation to exposing a major scandal or government wrongdoing. However, being a whistleblower does not always have to be so dramatic in the context of workplace…

READ ARTICLE
SEEN ON
Fox40-bw
KPIX-bw
SFGate-bw
marin-ij
Abc10-bw