DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia Provides One More Reason Employees Should Speak to an Employment Law Attorney

A recent Supreme Court decision, DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia, provides one more reason employees should consult with an employment law attorney. Imburgia concerned whether the employee and employer had agreed to arbitrate disputes. At issue was whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempted California law.

This should have been an easy case. The agreement at issue contained a clause that provided the arbitration agreement was unenforceable, if the “law of your state” made arbitration agreements containing class-action waivers unenforceable. The law of California at the time the agreement was entered into made arbitration agreements containing class-action waivers unenforceable. Therefore, argued the employee, the arbitration agreement was unenforceable.

The employee’s argument is valid, the premises sound. But the Supreme Court rejected the employee’s argument. The majority reasoned that, although at the time the agreement was made California law said that arbitration agreements containing class action waivers were unenforceable, nonetheless, after the Imburgia plaintiffs began this lawsuit, and before the Imburgia decision, came Concepcion. Concepcion held that federal law pre-empted state law, which in turn meant California law governing class-action waivers was pre-empted. In other words, the arbitration agreement was unenforceable at formation, but became enforceable four years later on account of the decision in Concepcion, a decision neither party could have predicted at the time of entering into the agreement.

For employees, this case means arbitration agreements create moving targets because, as here, the law could change during the course of your employment. The Supreme Court has therefore made one more reason for employees to consult an attorney because your legal rights can change as the laws related to your workplace develop.

[footer block_id=’778′]

Read more

gender discrimination lawyer

Can California Employees Be Legally Fired For Not Conforming to Gender Stereotypes?

Your employer cannot fire you because they believe you do not fit within what they consider to be an acceptable stereotype. However, that does not necessarily stop employers. According to the National…

READ ARTICLE
wrongful termination attorney

Nurse Sues Hospital For Wrongful Termination After Complaining About COVID-19 Safety

A registered nurse filed a wrongful termination lawsuit against his employer, saying he was fired last spring after expressing concerns about the hospital’s neglect of COVID-19 safety protocols. Firing an employee in…

READ ARTICLE
unpaid overtime lawyer

Wage Lawsuit Accuses Mortgage Company Of Unlawful Pay Practices

A common myth is that all commissioned employees can work unlimited hours without being paid overtime. While employees may not fully understand when they are entitled to overtime, sometimes employers themselves are…

READ ARTICLE
racial discrimination lawyer

San Francisco Transit Worker Claims Racial Harassment by Purported KKK Members

An Afro-Mexican man alleged that three of his coworkers on a San Francisco transit job site harassed him and refused to work with non-white employees. He was fired after complaining to his…

READ ARTICLE
SEEN ON
Fox40-bw
KPIX-bw
SFGate-bw
marin-ij
Abc10-bw