It can be hard to speak up at work when you know something isn’t right.

When Speaking Up at Work Leads to Losing Your Job: What California Workers Should Know

It can be hard to speak up at work when you know something isn’t right. Many California workers fear retaliation if they report a work injury or try to assert their employee rights. A lawsuit filed in Santa Clara County Superior Court claims that a worker was fired based on unlawful reasons in retaliation for reporting a workplace injury.

According to the complaint, a former truck driver for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. worked long shifts transporting hazardous materials from 2018 to 2022. The company allegedly failed to pay him proper wages. He also didn’t receive legally required meal and rest breaks. On top of that, the lawsuit claimed that a hostile work environment developed where a supervisor treated him unfairly while showing favoritism toward another employee.

Things only got worse when the truck driver reportedly got injured after tripping over an unattended bag at work. Rather than receiving assistance or reasonable accommodations after the incident, he was fired the next day. The company cited on-the-job phone use as the reason for his termination. However, he contends that his job duties involved using the phone for navigation and communication while making deliveries.

If a court finds these claims to be true, they would fall under California laws that protect workers from retaliation. State law makes it clear that employees have the right to report injuries, unsafe work conditions or illegal conduct at work without facing retaliation. Workers who speak up about wage and hour violations or file complaints are legally protected from being fired, disciplined or treated unfairly because of it.

The lawsuit also brings up common issues many California workers face, including unpaid overtime and missed meal and rest breaks. The general rule for overtime pay is that non-exempt employees must be paid time-and-a-half their regular rate when working more than eight hours in a single day or more than 40 hours in a week.

Breaks are another area where employers sometimes cut corners. Most non-exempt workers should get regular rest and meal breaks. These breaks are not just a perk; they are a legal requirement. Employers who violate the rules could face penalties.

Employees who work over five hours during a day should get a 30-minute meal break. This break should be uninterrupted and off the clock, meaning you’re not expected to answer calls, respond to emails or stay on standby. You’re also allowed to leave the workplace during the break. In addition to meal breaks, workers are generally entitled to a 10-minute rest break for every four hours worked.

Along with being unlawful, wage and hour violations can cause real financial strain for workers. The impact of unpaid overtime or withheld breaks goes beyond just a missing paycheck. The added stress can also affect your health and safety. That’s why California law takes these violations seriously.

Remember, cases like this are about more than just the individual filing the lawsuit. They serve as a reminder of the protections California law offers to workers across all kinds of jobs, whether you’re making deliveries, working in restaurants or sitting at a desk.

The rules around overtime and rest and meal breaks can get complicated depending on the nature of your job and work schedule. Understanding your rights is the first step toward making sure you’re being treated fairly. If something feels off, it’s worth asking questions and consulting an experienced employment law attorney.

If you believe your employer has violated your rights or retaliated against you for speaking up, McCormack Law Firm is here to help. Our San Francisco employment lawyers have experience representing workers in all types of employment law cases across various industries. Contact us today to schedule a free initial consultation.

Disclaimer: This article is for information purposes only. McCormack Law Firm is not involved in this case.

Read more

Paula Byrne, a 44-year-old employee who worked at Google until 2023, submitted a complaint stating that the company discriminated against employees who took parental leave or planned to do so during the 2023 layoffs.

Google Discriminated Against Employees on Parental Leave In Recent Lawsuit

Today’s contemporary workplace allows employees to depend on parental leave policies to manage their careers and family responsibilities. These workplace protections serve a crucial function because they prevent employees from suffering negative…

READ ARTICLE
A counselor working at MedMark in Vallejo, California, sought to return to work after an extended medical leave while requesting accommodations for his return. The employee's request was rejected, and the employee allegedly suffered disability-based termination.

Treatment Center Disability Discrimination Case Highlights Workers’ Rights to Request Reasonable Accommodations

Workplace disability discrimination represents more than a violation of labor regulations. The absence of equality creates an obstacle that prevents employees from doing their job duties and returning to work. For disabled…

READ ARTICLE
MyPerfectResume recently issued a report that revealed what older workers have to face.

The Reality of Age Discrimination in the Workplace: Insights from a New Study

Many employees over the age of forty may feel that their age becomes an obstacle at their workplace. Age discrimination in employment exists more frequently than it should, and it manifests in…

READ ARTICLE
Discrimination in hiring is not always easy to spot, especially when disguised behind so-called business reasons.

Bay Area Job Seeker Sues 49ers’ Eyewear Partner for National Origin Discrimination

In today’s job market, many employers tout their commitment to diversity and inclusivity, yet the reality for some job seekers can be starkly different. Discrimination in hiring is not always easy to…

READ ARTICLE
SEEN ON
Fox40-bw
KPIX-bw
SFGate-bw
marin-ij
Abc10-bw